Sadiya and Siquamian: What drives some to harm others without justification?
You may seem to harm or pain with another peaceful person who cannot return the saa to you, the saa'a, unbearable cruelty, but it is noteworthy that this happens in a way that exceeds what you can imagine.
Why do some deal harshly with others who do not pose a threat to them, sometimes including their children? What is the source of this behavior, and for what purpose is practiced?
In 1658, the French philosopher Blaise Pascal concluded that humans are "the glory of this universe, its sickness and its induction as well." We love and hate, help others and damage them, extend the hand to them with peace, and challenge them with knives.
Although we understand that we find a person who has angry, or acted with a rush, in defense of himself or in revenge on another person, the matter is different if we see him hurt others without justification, as we may ask him at the time with condemnation: "How did you dare to do so?"
In any case, humans are presented to this or that behavior, either to bring pleasure to themselves or to avoid feeling pain. It is known that harming others, most of us push pain, a feeling that does not like us. This suggests that there are two reasons that may push humans, to harm those who have not damage them; Either they do not feel the pain of others, or they enjoy it!
The most finished reading
There is a third reason, which may stand behind our harm to people who have not harmed us, which is that we consider them - despite their peaceful appearance - a threat to us.
So a person can form a danger to your social position, even if it does not threaten you physically or financially. This may help explain the causes of behaviors, which may seem bewildering at first glance, as if we see a person who harms others, for example, to help him, for example.
While liberal societies assume that you suffer from a person, it means to harm you, some philosophers do not agree with this idea. Away from that controversy, the question remains: Can we, in the twenty -first century, continue to classify humans as cruelty, not good or not?
Sixteen and psychologically disturbed
We can define the sadist person, that he is the one who enjoys harming or humiliating others, and feels - more than anyone else - with what they feel of pain because of this.
Although it is linked in the popular imagination between sadism and those who practice torture and commit murders, there is a lower extreme pattern than sadism, which is more common, and it is called "sadism that is practiced on a daily basis."
Those who practice "sadism daily" enjoy hurting others, or watching them as they suffer. From this standpoint, they are likely to feel pleasure to watch bloody films, find battles and quarrels exciting, and consider torture fun.
Despite the scarcity of the number of these people, they are not a few, about 6% of university students, admit that they enjoy hurting others.
You may find those practicing this "daily sadism", in the form of communicating via the Internet, or bullies of their schoolmates.
In the games played on the Internet, and the participants are in which certain roles are rejected, you will find that these people are mostly, who deliberately harass other players, and seek to provoke them to spoil their pleasure. Those people also attach to violent electronic games, and they become more serious the more they practice it.
But if we move to the psychologically disturbed, or those known as the "psychopathies", we will find that they do not harm the other peaceful people just because they enjoy this, although this constitutes a possible reason, but because they want to achieve a goal, behind such behavior.
These "sakeopopies" can act on this, because they are less likely to feel feelings such as fear, remorse or compassion. Although these people can determine the extent of the pain that others suffer because of their actions, this does not lead to being affected by this suffering in any way, which means that they "enjoy" a "dangerous set of skills."
Over the past centuries, mankind has brought itself, which made it difficult for many of its structures to harm and harm their peers.
Many of those who may harm, torture or kill another person will remain prey to pursue this experience for them, in the future.
But there is no doubt that a person suffering from psychological disorder is a strong indication of the possibility of violence without justification or provocation against others.
Of course, the person needs us to know whether or not he is dealing with a person from this category. We may be able to determine this with a high degree of accuracy, as soon as you look at the face of those who talk to him, or by interacting with him for a short period.
Unfortunately, the "psychologically disturbed" realizes that we are able to do so, which causes them to try to resist and void, by striving hard, in order to look good, and leave the first positive impression of them.
On the other hand, most people, fortunately, do not suffer from these "socimical" features. The percentage of these, does not exceed 0.5 percent.
However, things differ when we look at their percentage among prison inmates, as it reaches about 8 percent of prisoners and 2 percent of female prisoners.
But not all psychologists are dangerous. As those who are alienated from them socially communicating with others are seeking to obtain feelings of excitement they seek, through drug use or engaging in dangerous activities.
As for the "Sikatbion" who take away to act in a way that benefits those around them and society in general, they try to obtain these feelings of excitement, by pursuing bridges behind new and innovative ideas.
Therefore, these people can change the world in which we all live, in light of the fact that innovations are the factor that currently constitutes our societies. But we have to point out here that the change that these people may occur, may be positive or negative.
Where do these qualities come from?
No one really knows why some of us become sad. There are those who see that the sadism is a mechanism of adaptation, which helped us to slaughter animals, when we were relying on hunting them and devouring their meat. While others note that these qualities helped those who are characterized by power and power.
One day, the famous Italian thinker, philosopher, and diplomat Nicolo McKavili said that "the disturbances and chaos are the manufacture of time, not humans."
In line with that, neuroscientists believe that sadism can be a method of survival, developed by human traffic and eras, which has harsh conditions.
When specific foods become scarce, the level of a nervous carrier bearing the name "Serotonin" is in the central nervous system.
At the same time, psychological or "psychopathic" disorder can be formed.
Some studies have linked one to a high level of these disorders and enjoy more fertility. Although other studies indicated the exact opposite. The reason for this is the perception, that those who suffer from "psychopathic" have special benefits in terms of reproductive capacity, in environments with harsh conditions.
In fact, the number of those suffering from these disorders can increase, in light of unstable competitive conditions. The capabilities of these people make them professors in manipulation and maneuver. Their rush and bridge helps them to take risks and get short -term gains.
Perhaps those who watched the movie "Wall Street", remember how the "Sikatiya" character, which was called "Gordon Giko", succeeded in earning millions of dollars.
But although enjoying these qualities, their owners may give an advantage in the world of institutions and companies, it does not provide for men specifically, except a limited advantage in order to obtain leadership sites.
On the other hand, "psychopathic" association with creativity, as an explanation for the ability of this type of psychological disorder, may be a survival of all these years.
In this regard, mathematician Eric and Einstein says that people in general are the ones who lead the movement of creativity and innovation. But the value of this may decline, if you live in an environment that supports the origin of creative thinking.
Sadia and psychopathic are also associated with other characteristics, such as narcissism and Machiavellia. These qualities combined are called "the dark factor in the personality", or an acronym with the "worker de".
In addition to this and that, there is a genetic factor related to this issue, whose role ranges between large and medium, which means that some may be born, and they carry such characteristics, without having them, guilt or gear.
Away from this genetic issue, the parents, who carry the personality of each of them, may transfer a great deal of that "dark factor", their negative qualities to their young, by behaving with them in an abusive way.
Likewise, our vision of others, who behave in ways that those who carry this "dark factor" can lead to their wings, until we learn from them to act on this way. This means that each of us has a role in reducing the level of cruelty in our societies.
Fear and degradation of the status of opponents
Although sadism involves enjoying the humiliation and pain of others, it is often said that others are considered in a lower level of human status, which makes us deal with them harshly. In this context, potential victims are called "dogs" or "cockroaches", which makes it easier for others to harm them, as some say.
There is a matter related to this, related to what some studies revealed, that a person's violation of one of the norms and social rules limits our brains to treat his face as less "human" than in reality. This would make it easier for us to punish those who violate the recognized behavioral rules.
Although it is nice to feel that we will not harm someone if we consider it a human being, this represents a serious illusion at the same time as well.
As Psychologist Paul Bloom says, the worst kind of cruelty may be based on "not stripping others of their human nature."
Some of us may harm others, specifically because they know that those people who will be harmed, human beings who are not satisfied with themselves, humiliation, humiliation, or contempt.
Among the examples of this, the Nazi Party in Germany in the second quarter of the twentieth century, to degrade the status of millions of Jews and their consideration in a lower level of humans, by calling them to be deafness and lice.
But despite this, the Nazis insulted the Jews, tortured them, and their souls were also lost, specifically because they saw that they were human beings, who will suffer from exposure to insult and a miserable treatment of such.
Contempt for good
Sometimes, people may harm those who are beneficial to them. This was a subject of a study, in which the sample members were involved in a game, which allows them to put money in a collective box; So that they all get a larger return whenever it is placed in the box more sums, regardless of what each of them paid for this purpose, or whether it has paid money from the original, or not.
According to the study, every person was granted at the end of the game, the right to waive a side of his profits in exchange for another player to punish, against the background of the amount he chose to invest in the box. This punishment is to deduct part of this other player's profit in turn. In short, this means enabling the first player, to be a "hateful person".
Although the study showed that some players chose to punish their peers, who decided to invest a limited amount of money in the fund, or refrained from allocating any money for that at all, they also revealed that there, who accepted to be deducted part of his profits, to punish those who invested more money than him. It is noteworthy that such behavior seemed meaningless at all. The generous players are supposed to give their colleagues the opportunity to obtain greater returns; Why did colleagues seek to discourage them from that?
This phenomenon is known anyway as "contempt for the act of good". One can see it in different parts of the world. In societies that rely on hunting and gathering fruits, successful fishermen criticize, because they hunted a large animal, even if this spoil is, means everyone gets greater than meat.
This phenomenon may be attributed to our tendency to refuse to submit to the domination of others. The player who has invested fewer sums in the collective box in the framework of the game that we talked about previously, may fear that others will look at his colleague most contributing to his money as "a person who prefers to cooperate with him more than others."
Hence a threat to become the most generous person, the dominant or dominant personality of the group. Perhaps we remember here the phrase that the famous French writer Voltaire said that "the best is the enemy of goodness."
Nevertheless, the phenomenon of "contempt for the deed of good" is not without a positive, unprecedented aspect, which is that criticism of the perpetrators of goodness or reduce their destiny makes us more response to their ideas. One study has revealed that allowing the researchers to express their hatred of the vegetarians, borders the sample personnel to become less encouraged to eat meat. Thus, the shooting of the bearer of a message or his crucifixion may lead to his message becomes more accepted by the masses.
A cruelty as much as it prevents you from being good
In the movie "Weblash", a music teacher uses harsh methods, with the aim of pushing one of his students to reach the peak of brilliance and excellence in performance.
But we may now have become more negligent than such methods. Indeed, the famous German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche said long ago, that we have been hating such cruelty, too much.
For Nietzsche, the cruelty of a teacher like this that appears in the film is in the interest of his student, based on the fact that people can deal cruelly with themselves, so that they can become like them, which they want to be.
Nietzsche has already seen that a person exposes a harsh treatment, helping him to gain courage and ability to likely and innovate together.
Do we have from this standpoint to become more willing to expose ourselves and others to suffer, in order to gain such positive qualities?
We can answer "No" to this question. We now know what a long -term consequence of the long -term consequences, which can result in our treatment with harshly on the part of others, including our physical and mental health damage. We are also increasingly identifying the benefits of one's sympathy for himself, not treating them harshly.
Moreover, it can be said that the perception that it is necessary for one to suffer to develop, is doubtful in its health. It is possible for the same thing to happen to a person, by doing it with positive events in his life, such as being in love, or having children, or accomplishing him, dear goals on his heart.
We can also say that education using harsh methods opens the door to abuse of power, and engaging in sadistic and self -motivated practices.
Fortunately, this does not constitute the only option available to us, on this track.
.jpeg)
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق