Trump brings together world powers in China - Economist
The headlines of the newspapers we are showing on Wednesday talk about the nuclear trinity gathering, "North Korea, Russia and China", shared against the policies of US President Donald Trump, while the Economist believes that the reason is due to the last "Tanmer". In the Washington Post an article talks about an Iranian nuclear provocation to the United States. And in the New York Times, Google Technology Giant is scaling, so who will be the next giant?
We start from the Economist article entitled "The American anti -American Jinping Party", where the newspaper drew to "the largest gatherings of authoritarian regimes in the living memory, in the presence of Vladimir Putin from Russia and Masoud Bizchitan from Iran and Alexander Lukashenko from Belarus," as she put it.
The official reason for the gathering is the Scheghai Cooperation Organization Summit (SCO) in Tianjin, followed by the eighth anniversary of the end of World War II, including a military parade in Tiananmen Square on September 3.
But until you see the cost of "Trump", count the world leaders who are flowing to China, the newspaper says.
New
You may think that the place where leaders of the most prominent countries meet to discuss the future of the world is the capital of the United States, Washington, or the United Nations headquarters in New York, but the reality is not as you expect, at a time when the newspaper is trying to explain about a new reality formed, and its center is China.
The most finished reading
The Chinese president hosts more than 20 heads of state and prime minister in his country, and away from the declared reasons for the meeting, this gathering has a deeper importance for President Xi, according to the newspaper.
The article explains that the gathering for the Chinese president means that his country has become a "global leader and a source of stability and prosperity." According to his belief, "the reason for this is due to the United States, which launches commercial wars with almost everyone, and undermines its own network of military alliances and security partnerships."
Kim Jong Un, from North Korea, attended a traveler with a armored train on his first visit to China since 2019, while the newspaper refers to the guests of Xi, who included countries believed to tend to the West like Turkey, Egypt, Vietnam, and Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi, while the article draws to India from America to China.
This came after "Donald Trump's catastrophic mistake in targeting India with very high customs tariffs and embracing its enemy, Pakistan, after a dispute in May," the newspaper says.
However, the article believes that the majority of countries gathered in China for economic, commercial goals against Trump's decisions and sanctions, so "the claim of something leading a global alliance of forces skeptical of America is not a fantastic matter as you might think" in this regard, but on the other hand, and with the exception of a number of "authoritarian regimes" there will be no major alliance of military targets.
However, "security cooperation between authoritarian regimes is deepening. Russia and North Korea are working on space and satellite systems. In exchange for China's support in the Ukraine issue, Russia is believed to provide it with more sensitive military technologies, including submarine payment systems and missile defense systems," according to the article.
The newspaper concludes that the scene of China, as it brings together a large part of the world, was not possible even five years ago. The list of guests of Xi "does not prove that China is running a new global system yet. But it shows the extent of Trump's damage to American interests."
"Hope is not an effective strategy"
And not far from fears of China's alliances, American concerns are still existing towards the Iranian nuclear program, according to an article presented by the Washington Post.
"After two and a half months of the United States launched air strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, after which President Donald Trump mediated the ceasefire to end the 12 -day Israel War, leaders in Tehran returned to playing their old games from challenge, threat and fraud to hide information about the remainder of their program," the newspaper says.
Since the June attacks on Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan facilities, the regime has suspended its cooperation with international nuclear inspectors. Tehran also refused to reveal the highly enriched uranium stock, which was in possession of it before the attacks, and its place was no longer known, according to the newspaper.
She also says that the inspectors were allowed last Wednesday, to visit the Bushehr reactor, which is still working, but they were not allowed to see the remaining facilities set by B-2 launchers, as part of the "midnight" operation.
The most optimistic interpretation, as Washington Post wants to call it, is that "Iran prevents inspectors for fear of obtaining an independent confirmation that its 30 -year -old nuclear program was destroyed, but hope was never an effective strategy to combat spread."
"This predicament is partly due to the lack of a completely reliable evaluation of the effectiveness of air strikes, while the outstanding questions include the size of the Iranian program that was destroyed and the severe damage it caused, and whether Iran's capabilities have been late for years or for months only."
The newspaper reminds Iran's obligations under the 2015 international nuclear agreement, and believes that Tehran violates these obligations.
Despite Trump's withdrawal from this agreement in his first term, she says that the agreement remained valid for other signed countries.
The newspaper refers to a decision taken on Thursday, Britain, France and Germany as a thirty -day countdown, to re -impose sanctions. "These sanctions will enter into force unless the system resumes its full cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, and it is committed to holding direct talks with the United States, and the missing uranium is announced." On the other hand, Tehran is warned of a "harsh response" in the event of sanctions, threatening to withdraw from the nuclear proliferation treaty.
In the end, the newspaper says, "If Tehran extracts any lesson from June, it is that the United States is not afraid to use military power to prevent Iran from having nuclear weapons," the newspaper says.
"Crushing Google"
"The government crushed Google, this is a profitable act," so the American journalist Benjamin Abbatta titled his article in the New York Times.
Abbreum likens what is going on with the Silicon Valley giants - the Global Center for Technology and Innovation Industry - to a large extent with what happened with the famous American writer Laura Ingevis Wilder, who "filmed her life in the wilderness as a story of a victory for self -reliance, almost ignoring that the government provided them with the land, supported railways, and helped her family exceed the harsh winter."
The writer believes that technology companies today tell the same story so that its successes appear to be an individual genius and self -struggle, "while in reality the government had a basic role, whether through constant support or strong interventions in decisive moments."
The newspaper says the anti -monopoly laws played in the twentieth century, a prominent role in curbing the power of giant companies and making room for new competitors.
And she talks about the Update judge’s order on Tuesday, which is directed to Alphabet, known as Google, “with the participation of part of the research data with its competitors, in an attempt to limit the dominance of its engine on the Internet after considering it illegal monopoly last year. Although the court did not agree to dismantle the company as the government requested, the decision re -recalls the historical role of the government in controlling markets.”
But this role has declined in recent decades, "which allowed a few technology companies to grow almost without restrictions, and to swallow any possible competitor ... The latest examples is the acquisition of these companies on the pioneers of artificial intelligence, so that the profits remain confined to the hands of the shareholders themselves."
The article believes that "Google's story did not start with its founding in the nineties at the hands of Sergey Breen and Larry Paige, but its roots return to half a century before that, when the government forced major companies such as AT & T and RCA to share its innocence, which paved the way to the birth of the computers. Microsoft. Then the government's role with Microsoft itself came at the beginning of the millennium, when it limited its ability to control the Internet, which allowed Google to flourish. "
The article concludes by saying: "No one knows who the new companies that will fill the void will be if Google's dominance declines, but the governmental role is clear: opening the field. As for the rest, you return to those ambitious programmers who work in their bedrooms and temporary offices, and dream of making something greater."
.jpeg)
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق