"Why is Syria in the era of Sharia the right to communicate with Israel?" - Newspaper display
In light of the accelerated political movement in Syria, the pens of writers are active in international newspapers, dealing with controversy within the Syrian opposition about dialogue with Israel, and analyzing media leaks that talk about secret meetings aimed at discussing a possible security agreement under Washington. On the cultural level, the American press highlights the phenomenon of "historical nostalgia" among members of the generation "Z", who express their increasing desire to return to the pre -Internet lifestyle.
We start our press tour from the Emirati newspaper "The National", and an article by the writer Raghda Dergham in which she wonders, "Why does Syria have the right to communicate with Israel?"
The writer says that the new Syrian leadership, after "expelling Iran and Hezbollah from its territory", leads a qualitative shift in its regional relations, especially the relationship with Israel. And it is subjected to that this change does not come within the framework of regional leadership as it was in the era of Bashar al -Assad, but rather a pragmatic motive focused on internal priorities.
Dergham shows that Syria, which was previously "the pillar of the Iranian expansionist project", is seeking today to restore regional and international positioning. This shift, according to her saying, is carried out with Gulf support and in American sponsorship, under a new Syrian leadership represented by the head of the transitional phase Ahmed Al -Shara.
The writer explains that there are reports that talk about the possibility of signing a security agreement between Syria and Israel under American auspices, on September 23, after a prospective speech of Sharia at the United Nations. Despite the denial of the Syrian Foreign Ministry, the official Syrian News Agency quoted a meeting of Foreign Minister Asaad Shaibani with an Israeli delegation, to discuss files related to reducing escalation and non -intervention, and monitoring the ceasefire in the Suwayda governorate.
The most finished reading
Dergham explains that the merely Damascus's readiness to communicate with Israel, despite the "Israeli military aggression" in Gaza, indicates the pragmatism of the new leadership, which places Syria's interest over any ideological agenda or leadership aspiration.
It also indicates that "the Syrian government has not yet extended its full control, and there are concerns about the expansion of extremist groups. Therefore, the Sharia talk about the refusal of division, and its call to reunite Syria without resorting to violence, must be translated into actual steps," according to the writer, especially in light of the Sharia accusing some Syrian groups of "loyalty to regional powers or in Israel."
The writer adds that the American envoy Tom Barak played a direct role in pushing the path of the Syrian-Israeli rapprochement and dealing with sectarian tensions in As-Suwayda. She pointed out that this American role is taking place in coordination with Türkiye and the Gulf states, with the aim of keeping Syria in the Arab incubator and attracting investments.
Dergham believes that "Washington and the major Arab forces welcomes the decline in Iranian influence in the Levant, and Syria today is the cornerstone of its strategy to curb Tehran."
The author links this to what is happening in Lebanon, especially if Israel responds to Beirut's decision to disarm Hezbollah. It warns that "the party's insistence on maintaining its weapon threatens the failure of all attempts to resolve, and calls for further escalation."
Dergham concludes its article by saying that the accusation of Damascus of betrayal just because of its involvement in understandings with Israel is not in its place, as it is simply seeking to restore its lands from Israeli control.
"A new proposal on As -Suwayda creates a difficult dilemma for the Syrian government."
In the newspaper "Turkey Today", Omar Ozkizelgik writes an article entitled "A new proposal on the endosperm that creates a difficult dilemma for the Syrian government", in which he discusses the developments of the Syrian scene in light of talking about a possible rapprochement with Israel, pointing to an American -Israeli initiative that proposes the establishment of a humanitarian corridor from Israel to the province of As -Suwayda.
The writer shows that the United States hopes that this initiative will contribute to "re -activating the normalization talks between Syria and Israel", especially after previous reports indicating progress in bilateral understandings, before these efforts were cut as a result of a "misunderstanding" that radically changed the course of events.
Ozkizelgik explains that "misunderstanding" is followed by a dangerous Israeli escalation, which was the bombing of the Syrian Ministry of Defense and the Presidential Palace Square.
"This strike was a great setback for Ahmed Al -Shara, who had used the term of the State of Israel in his political discourse, as an unprecedented step in the Syrian official discourse," according to the writer.
And he offers that Turkey, despite its hostility with Israel, encouraged the Sharia to proceed towards a security understanding with Israel, but this trend was not the subject of internal consensus, neither among the Headquarters for the Liberation of Al -Sham nor among the broader Syrian opposition. "
Ozkizelkik shows that Sharia, despite fierce criticism even from its closest supporters, has not retracted communication with Israel, but rather reached the point of thinking about Syria's accession to the "Abrahamic agreements" under certain circumstances. However, Sharia was aware that this path carries a severe risk, which would shake the cohesion of its base, and give what he described as "extremist groups" an opportunity to exploit popular anger, according to the writer.
According to Ozkizelgik, many have argued that "Israel does not trust, and that the dialogue with it is a form of tampering," which prompted the Sharia to retract the speech of "the State of Israel" to return to the traditional term: "the Israeli entity."
The writer concludes by explaining Washington's position, which is currently focusing on "building confidence" between Syria and Israel, but this goal may turn into a burden on Sharia if it is interpreted as unilateral Syrian concessions. As his loss of internal support, according to Ozkizelgik, will undermine the American strategy itself support Syria's stability through "gradual normalization" with Israel.
Why does the generation "Zd" revive the nineties?
In the American "New York Times", a researcher in psychology, Clay Routlidge, says that anxiety about the influence of technology on the young generation is no longer exclusive to older generations, but these fears are common among members of the generation, which increases itself.
The writer presents the results of a poll conducted in cooperation with the "Harris Paul" Foundation in 2023, where he expressed 80 percent of the "Z" generation (born after 1997) their concern about excessive dependence on technology, and 75 percent expressed their fear of the impact of social media on mental health, while 58 percent saw that modern technology spacing among people more than they approached them.
Routling shows that what caught his attention in particular is that 60 percent of these young people expressed their wish to return to "a time before the comprehensive digital communication", that is, to an era they did not live in the phenomenon known as "historical nostalgia", which is nostalgia for a previous past of the individual's time.
The writer explains that this type of nostalgia differs from the traditional personal nostalgia, but it has become evident in the behavior of consumer consumer from the young generation, who are heading towards buying old cylinders, paper books, and tablets, not only motivated by the tradition of adults, but as a search for alternatives to a sunken life in digital.
In the face of the question about whether or not this historical nostalgia is a healthy phenomenon, Routlands explains that scientific research indicates that nostalgia, whether personal or historical, can be a source of inspiration, meaning and psychological balance. Even short moments of meditation on loved memories, or listening to an old song, may raise morale and enhance the feeling of belonging and give one a sense of goal.
In his presentation, the writer continues the results of a survey that included more than 2000 adults in the United States, as it showed that 68 percent of the "Z" generation feel nostalgic for eras they did not live, and 73 percent of them are attracted to the media, patterns, hobbies, and traditions that belong to these ages. 78 percent also expressed their desire that modern technological products be combined with design elements of the past.
Rotlidge notes that historical nostalgia is not limited to the "Z" generation, as high levels of it also appear in the millennial generation and "X", compared to older generations.
The writer concludes his article by confirming that this nostalgia does not mean the rejection of technology, but rather a form of "review and balance", allowing a full digital generation to benefit from the advantages of modernity without losing the elements of real life that remains necessary for human growth.
.jpeg)
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق