"Did the recognition of a Palestinian state change the rules of the game in Gaza?" Newspapers
On the global newspapers tour today, we review articles discussing the move to recognize a Palestinian state, and whether it represents a shift in the course of the war in Gaza, amid the escalation of international pressure and the decline in Hamas popularity.
We also highlight the analyzes related to the potential Russian gains in light of Trump's return, and the meeting with Putin in Alaska.
In a different direction, the French press warns against the exacerbation of the effects of the screens on the children, calling for a ban on the sale of smartphones for those under the age of 15, until the effective digital protection laws are effective.
"The war took an increasing international dimension."
The beginning of the Australian newspaper "WATO", and an article entitled "Did the recognition of the country change the rules of the game in Gaza? Only for the delusions" of the journalist Iris McCler.
McLer discusses Australia's accession to France, the United Kingdom and Canada in supporting recognition of a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly next month.
The most finished reading
She explains that the Australian Prime Minister, Anthony Albaniz, indicated that Hamas does not support the two -state solution, but rather seeks to control the entire land between the river and the sea, which is supported by the writer.
McLer notes that the Fatah movement, which dominated the West Bank, was the one who chose the path of settlement and division of the land, unlike Hamas, which controls Gaza.
"Despite its refusal to solve the two countries, Hamas is trying to employ international recognition of a Palestinian state as a political victory, after a 22 -month destroyer, in which, according to the Hamas Ministry of Health, more than 60,000 Palestinians were killed, and large areas of Gaza were subjected to mass destruction."
The author says that Hamas began the conflict on October 7, 2023, with what she described "the most violent attack since the founding of Israel", and led to the longest and most expensive wars in its history.
But she added that the scene has changed recently, as Arab parties criticized Hamas, and called them to disarm, release the hostages and withdraw from Gaza.
However, Hamas responded, as McCler mentioned, came by its leader Ghazi Hamad in an interview with Al -Jazeera, where he stressed that "the weapon will not be thrown", and considered that "the strong strike on October 7 forced the world to recognize the Palestinian cause."
The writer refers to surveys that showed the decline in Hamas popularity, and the decrease in support of armed attacks, in exchange for the rise of support for a negotiating solution with Israel.
Inside Israel, McCler quotes that more than 75 percent of Israelis want to end the war in order to return the hostages of about 50, only 19 of them are still alive.
The author also explains that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's recent plan "to expand military operations and occupy Gaza temporarily does not receive support in Israel even from the army."
McCler expresses that the war took an increasing international dimension, as countries like Germany began to impose a ban on the export of weapons to Israel, while the United States, despite its huge military support, sees that American pressure may be the only factor able to change the course of the war. The author states that Washington provided Israeli military aid during the war between 12.5 and 17.9 billion dollars.
The writer concludes that recognition of a Palestinian state will remain symbolic unless he gets decisive American support, and that the borders of this country are still not recognized by the main parties, including Israel, Hamas, and Fatah.
However, McCler believes that the growing international recognition causes the image of Israel and undermines the aspirations of the extreme right to include the West Bank and Gaza, at a time when Israel is facing increasing diplomatic isolation, as it puts.
"Putin should be careful about what he wishes."
In its article published in the New York Times, Dr. Hanna Note believes that Russian President Vladimir Putin may think that Donald Trump's return to the White House is a strategic gain for Russia, but she warns that this view may be deceptive.
Under the title "Putin should be careful about what he wishes," the writer says, during a few months of his second term, he succeeded in confusion of his allies with volatile statements about NATO, commercial wars, and his attacks on what he described as "gender ideology" - positions that are identical to Russian non -liberal policies.
Nutti explains that Trump, through his threats that included "swallowing" Canada, Greenland and Panama, gives the implicit legitimacy to the expansionist tendencies that Putin has always used to justify his invasion of Ukraine.
In a world, Trump is reshaping with flexible rules and volatile relations, in which the abstract force becomes the only currency, Russia appears, according to the writer, "a resource restricted, stuck in an endless war, and unable to review its true power."
Note notes that Trump did not give Putin Ukraine as he hoped. Despite the exclusion of Ukraine and Europe from the "Peace" summit that Trump holds in Alaska, which the writer considers "a diplomatic victory for Russia", the real result is not in the interest of Moscow.
The writer explains that Russian progress on the ground is expensive and slow, and even if the Russian army achieved a new penetration, the resistance of the Ukrainian people and Europe refused to abandon Kiev will transform without achieving the Russian dream.
Nutti refers to the decline in Russia's influence in areas it was in its vital field. In Nagorno Karabakh, Moscow stood in the hands of Azerbaijan's progress, and gave up Assad in Syria. Even in the face of American and Israeli strikes on Iran, Russia was satisfied with condemnation.
She adds that countries like Armenia, Kazakhstan and Georgia are still vulnerable to Russian pressure, but Putin's ability to expand is limited as long as the Ukraine war, which he does not seem to be prepared to end, drains.
The writer concludes by saying that Putin still believes that Ukraine must be for him, but in a world "is governed by Trump's mood and the principle of power makes the right", this obsession may cost Russia more than it can bear.
Smart phones must be banned for those under 15 years old
In a joint opinion article published by the French newspaper Le Monde, the psychiatrist Karen de Los, and the pediatricists Eric Osika and Selfie Dio Osika are the alarm about the delay in implementing digital protection procedures for children in Europe, demanding a ban on the sale of smartphones for those under 15 years of age as an urgent precaution.
The writer and the two doctors explain that the last announcement of the European Commission, on July 14, the launch of a technical system to verify an age within the digital services law, is an important step towards protecting minors from pornographic and violent content.
They add that France's decision to re -enforce age verification on pornographic sites after it has been suspended, represents a strong political signal. But they warn that the road towards the actual implementation of these decisions is still full of obstacles.
"There is still a huge gap between legal aspirations and the digital reality that our children live," says the author. The law that entered into force in February 2024 will not issue its first regulatory reports before 2026, while the statistical reality is shocking: 90 percent of children at the age of 12 who own smart phones, and half of the boys of this age are visiting pornographic sites monthly, and one in every five teenagers in Europe suffer from psychological disturbances, according to the World Health Organization.
From here, the "Excessive Exposure Coalition", which includes children's doctors, teachers and psychologists - calls for a ban on selling smartphones to minors under 15 years until the effectiveness and full implementation of European law is proven.
The author clearly expresses: "The idea may be shocking, but we prefer to launch the warning now instead of witnessing the collapse of the mental health of a complete generation."
The article concludes by saying: "What needs to be organized today is not only the content, but the conditions for access to it and the timing of intervention. And every delay will expand the gap between the reality experienced by adolescents in their bedrooms, and texts on European paper. Good intentions have turned into budgets - and it remains to turn them into real protection, before our children pay the price of indolence again."
.jpeg)
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق