الراس

اعلان مقاله

الرئيسية Perhaps Trump was playing golf during the spread of his death - an article in Wall Street Journal

Perhaps Trump was playing golf during the spread of his death - an article in Wall Street Journal

ربما كان ترامب يلعب الغولف خلال انتشار إشاعة موته - مقال في وول ستريت جورنال

Perhaps Trump was playing golf during the spread of his death - an article in Wall Street Journal

The press tour this day addresses an article talking about the presence of US President Donald Trump, to the point of spreading a rumor about his death after his absence for a short period, and another article indicating that the gas agreement between China and Russia represents a "threat" to the United States, and we are dealing with an article on the ministerial amendment made by the British Prime Minister, and described as a "last opportunity."

At Wall Street Journal, Joseph Epstein wrote an article in which he talks about Trump's death after his 3 -day absence on the weekend.

While Ibstin thinks that Trump spent most of his vacation between golf and spending time with his family, the American writer expressed his happiness at that short absence of Trump, explaining this by borrowing from his "continuous talk about his accomplishments, insulting his enemies, and threatening the rest of the world with customs duties."

But he talked about "exceptional energy" enjoyed by the Republican President, saying: "A president in modern history has never been present in front of us as Trump."

According to the writer, the "problem" lies in Trump's character, which "does not satisfy everyone", and that "the biggest problem is the continuous overlap of politics in our life that Trump's presidency brought."

The most finished reading

"The pledge to make America great again is the latest political promise, and perhaps the most pressing historical," said Joseph Epstein, and its founder, Trump, is present in our public life frequently to the point that his absence during the Labor Day holiday raised his death.

He added: "Whether I love it or hate him, it seems that no one can be neutral towards Trump. It is an embodiment of the political division."

The writer recently quoted the English philosopher, Michael Okchot, in which he says: "General attention and preoccupation with politics is the sure mark on the general deterioration in society," considering that over the past decade "the United States has been living with this political preoccupation."

The writer cited Oakishot's speech that "politics is the art of living together and dealing with a fair deal with each other, not to impose a lifestyle, but rather a common life," adding that while politics provided promises about the future, Oxchot preferred to live in the present.

In this regard, he believed that the two political parties in the United States "do not agree with this, each of which claims that he alone knows the way to an ideal life."

While the writer expressed his admiration for many Trump's policies, such as "his support for Israel, his fight against crime in cities, and his desire to end the Russian -Ukrainian war," but at the same time he hates "his arrogance, boasting and continuous flow of insults."

He said, "Political preoccupation is unlikely to end even after Trump left his position."

Therefore, the writer suggests "prohibiting politics in certain days of the Sunnah", similar to those holidays in which the stock exchange is closed.

    A gas line between China and Russia "threat" to the United States

    In the Financial Times, we read an article entitled: "The profitable gas deal between China and Russia may anger American energy exporters."

    The newspaper talked about the summit that brought together the leaders of China, Russia and North Korea and produced things that it described as "shocking", not only those related to new missile technologies and march submarines, and what seemed to be wolves of self -operating mechanism, but also indicating a different threat that energy investors have noticed related to "a possible progress in creating a new natural natural gas pipeline between Russia and China, which may leave American suppliers, if running out Outside the competition.

    The "Siber 2" pipeline will transport 50 billion cubic meters of natural gas to China annually, perhaps starting from early 2030, according to the newspaper, which said that "such investments in infrastructure are supported by decades -extending supply contract, and it is binding on the buyer and the seller."

    She stated that "the problem for other countries is that the cheapest Russian imports to China would replace a large amount of liquefied natural gas that China was expected to buy from other sources."

    So "it is expected that the US concern, which is the largest fuel export", is expected, especially since the exporting amount "will meet a large part of the demand for demand in China by about 150 billion cubic meters during that period."

    The newspaper says that even without the "Siber 2 power" project, there is already a risk of the flow of liquefied natural gas surplus in the system, as the International Energy Agency estimates that the projects under construction will add about 300 billion cubic meters annually of liquefied natural gas by 2030, almost half of the United States, which exceeds the expected growth of demand during that period, which creates a surplus until early 2030.

    A new pipeline between Russia and China will contribute to the extension of this surplus, which maintains the prices for a longer period, according to the newspaper.

    She said that liquefied natural gas development companies in the United States will enjoy some protection from these fluctuations in the short term, but the Siberian 2 pipeline will form in the long run a problem for these companies.

    A final opportunity for Starmer

    Moving to the Telegraph newspaper, James Kircop wrote, an article titled "Perhaps Starmer himself has given a last chance."

    The writer talked about the ministerial amendment made by British Prime Minister, Kiir Starmer, after the resignation of his deputy and the Minister of State for Housing, Angela Rainer, against the backdrop of tax problems.

    The writer said that Starmer's response to Rainer's resignation shows that he "learned the lesson well."

    He believed that the most prominent appointments in the ministerial amendment are Shaban Mahmoud in the Ministry of Interior, and McFaden has become in the Ministry of Labor and Pensions, and he said that these appointments indicate that Starmer identified the most important political needs of his government, and sent his most efficient ministers to meet them.

    He pointed out that the fate of the Prime Minister and perhaps the government of the Labor Party is now in their hands, and if they succeed in their mission, they may emerge as a Mahmoud's young man in the possible list to assume the prime minister.

    The writer expresses his agreement with the conversation that "the cabinet amendment was not a reaction, but rather an early implementation of a planned agenda in advance."

    Shabana Mahmoud is seen as "the best members of the government", with its focus on voters' concerns about law and order when she was a minister of justice. After assuming the position of Minister of Interior, he expects a strict approach while the Labor Party is struggling to deal with the rise of the UK Reform Party in relation to illegal immigration.

    The writer believes that the successful political parties are "alliances", which makes the cabinet amendment "a challenge to maintain the cohesion of the party's coalition ... This challenge will determine the leadership of Starmer or any other person who leads the Labor Party to the upcoming elections."

    ليست هناك تعليقات:

    إرسال تعليق

    يتم التشغيل بواسطة Blogger.